Bl
Bl
Bl
Bl
Bl
You are here:   Home »  Products »  PolyTrans|CAD+DCC  
Bl

Home > Supported File Formats > IFC to COLLADA


How to convert IFC (Industry Foundation Classes) to COLLADA (.dae)?


PolyTrans|CAD+DCC performs mathematically precise CAD, DCC/Animation, GIS and BIM 3D file conversions into all key downstream 3D packages and file formats. Okino software is used and trusted throughout the world by many tens of thousands of 3D professionals in mission & production critical environments, backed by respectable personal support directly from our core development team.

     

IFC

The Industry Foundation Classes (IFC) is a CAD data exchange object-based file format with a data model developed by buildingSMART to facilitate interoperability in the architecture, engineering and construction (AEC) industry, and is a commonly used collaboration format in Building information modeling (BIM) based projects.

IFC files can be written out by such industry standard programs as: ArchiCAD, Allplan, Autodesk's AutoCAD and Revit, Microstation, Tekla Structures, SmartPlant3D and Vectorworks.

Please note: you would always want to use the DWF-3D file format and the Okino DWF-3D file importer to import 3D model data from Autodesk's AutoCAD, Navisworks and Revit, as well as AVEVA's PDMS software.

It is may be safe to say that few 3D graphics users properly understand IFC or why/how it should be used, when it should be used or how it is to be used. In simplistic terms, IFC is NOT a universal data interchange file format like COLLADA, FBX, 3ds, OBJ, DXF, DWG, etc. Rather, IFC is more of an "abstraction" for an architectural model so that BIM companies can exchange IFC files for design iterations without any loss in overall geometric quality. Hence, the basis of IFC is to make an abstract building with stories, floors, doors, columns, windows, etc. From these hang "abstractions" such as 2D plan views and 3D renderable geometric data.

While IFC can be considered a standardized file format by BuildingSmart, not all 3D programs or 3D viewers will "interpret" an IFC file in the same manner due to the abstract nature of the file format and also by the generally loose manner in which a model can be defined and with different contexts and representations.

     

COLLADA

COLLADA (DAE) is a XML-based readable file format of the 2007/2008 era which had an original goal of allowing efficient cross conversion of 3D asset data between all of the major 3D DCC/Animation systems of that era. Many 3D software programs came to implement COLLADA but with varying levels of comformity and data reliability. COLLADA is more generally known as a polygonal mesh file format and not a MCAD/CAD/AEC/GIS format. Today people would usually use FBX over COLLADA, depending on the quality of the associated (and dated?) import/export converters.

Okino created one of the key implementations of the COLLADA file format in its import and export converters. However, it saw little need for them except for exporting into Cinema-4D from 2008 to 2012, as the primary gateway into Google Earth, and as our still-preferred method to move 3D assets into Blender (rather than FBX). COLLADA does have its place in these current and prior times.

Okino has a unique take on the COLLADA file format as Okino was at the very center of the DCC/Animation conversion world. In 2007 Rémi Arnaud and Mark Barnes argued that yet-another 3D file format was required and hence Sony funded their efforts to define COLLADA for the cross conversion of assets between (initially) 3ds Max and Maya. However, what they conveniently ignored was that Okino already had the defacto cross conversion system in place, for the prior decade, based on its BDF (binary data translation file format) for 3ds Max, Maya, Cinema-4D, Softimage, LightWave and others. In the mid 2000's there was a "not invented here" mindset and hence everyone wanted to stamp/force their own 3D file format on the industry: FBX (Autodesk), COLLADA (Sony), 3dxml (Dassault Systems), XAML-3D (Microsoft), U3D (Adobe and Intel), etc. There was little need or reason to have "yet-another" set of new 3D file formats. All, except FBX, would basically come and go as of 2007/2008. The implosion of the DCC/Animation industry of 2005-2007 and the 2008/2009 recession further hampered the long term adoption or need for COLLADA over Autodesk's FBX.

COLLADA is/was a very fine file format but it was really not needed at the time of its introduction in 2007. It only introduced yet-more confusion to the 3D graphics market as to which 3D file format to use to transfer 3D assets between packages. Developers generally implemented v1.4 of the COLLADA file specification then lost interest thereafter.

However, as a saving grace for COLLADA, all of the 3D software packages which had implemented a good COLLADA exporter became instant gateways to move their 3D assets into the then-new glTF file format of the mid 2010s, until such time that these same packages could add in their own glTF exporters.